ABSTRACT
Care of osteoporosis patients during COVID-19 pandemic is challenging. Due to lockdowns and restrictions, the management of osteoporosis has changed. Diagnosis of osteoporosis decreased and the influence of COVID-19 on drug prescriptions and dispensing is currently unclear. Therefore, the aim of the study was to assess the dispensing of anti-osteoporotic drugs during the Covid19 pandemic. Methods This study was a nationwide retrospective register-based observational study which included all patients in Austria aged >= 50 who received at least one prescription for anti-osteoporotic drug between January 2016 and November 2020. Pseudonymized individual-level patients' data were obtained from social insurance authorities and the Federal Ministry of Labour, Social Affairs, Health and Consumer Protection in Austria. Anti-osteoporotic agents were divided into: (i) oral bisphosphonates, (ii) intravenous bisphosphonates, (iii) selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), (iv) teriparatide (TPTD) and (v) Denosumab (DMAB). We used interrupted time series analysis with autoregressive integrated moving average models (ARIMA) for the prediction of drug dispensing. Results There were 2,884,627 dispensing of anti-osteoporotic drugs by 318,573 patients between 2016-2020. The mean monthly prescriptions for oral bisphosphonates (-14.5 %) and SERMs (-12.9 %) decreased during COVID-19 pandemic, compared to the non-COVID-19 period. The dispensing for intravenous bisphosphonates (1.7 %) and teriparatide (9.5 %) increased during COVID- 19. The prescriptions for DMAB decreased during the first lock-down in March and April 2020 (24 %), however increased by 29.1 % for the total observation time. The ARIMA model for alendronate showed, that the estimated step change was minus 1443 dispensing (95 % CI - 2870 to - 17), while the estimated change in slope was minus 29 dispensing per month (95 % CI - 327 to 270). Thus, there were 1472 (1443 + 29) fewer dispensing in March 2020 than predicted had the lockdown not occurred. Discussion The total number of prescriptions dispensed to patients treated with anti-osteoporotic medications declined rapidly during the first COVID-19 lockdown. The largest drops in absolute terms were observed for ibandronate, followed by alendronate, denosumab, zolendronic acid and risendronate. The observed decrease of DMAB during the first lockdown, was compensated in the following months. Current evidence suggests no need for discontinuation of anti-osteoporotic drugs during COVID-19 pandemic, nor because of vaccination. Taking into account the massive treatment gap for osteoporosis, and the related fracture risk, clinicians should continue treatment, even in times of pandemics.
ABSTRACT
Background: The determinants of the susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) manifestations are yet not fully understood. Amino-bisphosphonates (N-BPs) have anti-infammatory properties and have been shown to reduce the incidence of lower respiratory infections, cardiovascular events and cancer. Objectives: We conducted a population-based retrospective observational case control study with the primary objective of determining if oral N-BPs treatment can play a role in thesusceptibility to the development of severe COVID-19. Methods: Administrative ICD-9-CM and AT C data, representative of Italian population (9% sample of the overallpopulation), were analyzed. Oral N-BPs (mainly alendronate and risedronate) were included in the analysis. Patients treated with bisphosphonates (cases) were randomly matched (1:1 ratio) for age, sex and for other clinically relevant variables (presence of treatments other than bisphosphonates and hospitalizations) with all the health-assisted population without this treatment (controls). Results: Incidence of Covid-19 hospitalization was 12.32 [95%CI 9.61-15.04] and 11.55 [95%CI 8.91-14.20], of ICU utilization due to COVID-19 was 1.25 [95%CI 0.38-2.11] and 1.42 [95%CI 0.49-2.36] and of all-cause death was4.06 [95%CI 2.50-5.61] and 3.96 [95%CI 2.41-5.51] for oral N-BPs users and non-users, respectively (Figure 1A). Figure 1B Incidence and 95% CI of COVID-19 related events in N-BPs treated and untreated subjects with anti-osteoporotic drugs and without corticos-teroids. C. Incidence and 95% CI of COVID-19 related events in N-BPs treated and untreated without previous vertebral or hip fragility fractures. D. Incidence of COVID-19related events in bisphosphonates treated and untreated patients without previous vertebral or hip fracture without corticosteroid prescriptions. Conclusion: In conclusion, we found that the incidence of COVID-19 hospi-talization, intensive care unit (ICU) utilization and COVID-19 potentially related mortality were similar in N-BPs treated and non-treated subjects. Similar results were found in N-BPs versus other anti-osteoporotic drugs. We provided real-life data on the safety of oral N-BPs in terms of severe COVID-19 risk on a population-based cohort. Our results strongly support national and international guidelines that advocate against the discontinuation of oral bisphosphonates only for the fear of COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims Osteoporosis is a burdensome disease internationally, that is commonly diagnosed following fragility fracture. In line with national guidance, in 2018 the North Staffordshire Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) changed their management policy of patients aged ≥85 years who sustain fragility fractures. Instead of calling these patients for a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan, a letter was sent to the patient's General Practitioner, advising the empirical commencement of oral bisphosphonates. This audit aimed to evaluate whether the recommendations in this letter were enacted by GPs. Following audit, the text of the letter was changed, and a re-audit conducted to evaluate changes in practice. Methods Patients aged ≥85 years sustaining a fragility fracture between December 2018 and October 2020 were identified from FLS records. Summary Care Records (SCRs) were used to identify whether each patient was receiving a bisphosphonate prescription at time of audit (October 2020). Analysis was descriptive, to report the proportion of patients prescribed a bisphosphonate. Quality improvement methodology informed changes to the standard letter, using GP feedback. Re-audit of fragility fractures occurring between December 2020 and May 2021 was undertaken in July 2021 to assess possible impact. Results 408 eligible patients were identified in the initial audit, of which 79% were female. SCR data was available for 396 patients;median time between fracture and data collection was 9 months. 160 patients (40%) had a bisphosphonate prescribed as an acute or repeat prescription, of which >90% were alendronic acid. Following the first audit cycle, the letter was changed to address barriers to clinical decision-making including advice on relative contraindications and referral. 74 patient SCRs were reviewed in the 2nd audit cycle (85% female) and 38 (51%) were recorded as prescribed a bisphosphonate (median time between fracture and assessment 5-months). Conclusion Rates of bisphosphonate prescribing, in people aged ≥85 following a recommendation letter sent to the GP, have increased from 40% to 51% following quality improvement initiative. Furthermore, the proportion of patients prescribed a bisphosphonate is similar to previous national data in patients post-DXA. This is of interest, particularly given the de-prioritisation of non-communicable diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic, and demonstrates that an intervention which requires little time, can result in changes in practice. Limitations of this work include that the SCR only includes contemporaneous prescribing data so the period of time between drug recommendation and audit was different in 1st and 2nd cycles, meaning that adherence may be expected to be higher in the 2nd cycle, because the period of time between letter and data collection was shorter, and not because of a change in our intervention.
ABSTRACT
(Full story doi:10.1136/bmj.o861) Abortion Women in England keep right to take pills at home Women in England will still have access to medical abortion pills to take at home, as MPs voted by 215 to 188 to retain a service introduced temporarily during the pandemic. Since the service was first offered two years ago 150 000 women have had abortions at home. (Full story doi:10.1136/bmj.o854) Osteoporosis First new drug for over a decade The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended romosozumab for postmenopausal women with a high risk of fracture,2 after a clinical trial showed that taking it before alendronic acid reduced the relative risk of vertebral fractures by 50% over 24 months when compared with alendronic acid alone. Vitamin D Evidence call for how to improve uptake The Office for Health Improvement and Disparities called for evidence from the public, health experts, and industry bodies on how to improve uptake of vitamin D and reduce inequalities.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Teriparatide for sever osteoporosis is followed by antiresorptive drugs, and one option in patients with gastric intolerance is zolendronic acid or denosumab (1-5). During pandemic lockdown, the access to bone assessment was limited (1-5). Type 1 diabetic patients are particularly at risk for bone loss, but also for COVID-19 infection, thus the importance of respecting the pandemic rules (1-5). We aim to introduce a female case diagnosed with severe menopausal osteoporosis that was followed during post-teriparatide sequence of medication, including during pandemic days. Case report: This is a type 1 diabetic female of 77 y who was first diagnosed with menopausal osteoporosis 8 y ago (lumbar T-score of-3.1 SD) and started medication with weekly alendronate in addition to vitamin D supplements. After 3 y, she suffered a single spontaneous vertebral fracture thus teriparatide was initiated for 2 y (with good tolerance): lumbar T-score went from -3.1 to -1.9 SD. In the meantime, due to bilateral coxarthrosis she needed bilateral hip replacement. Further on, she continued with biannually denosumab for 8 injections, reaching a lumbar BMD-DXA 0.942 g/cm2, T-score of -2 SD, Z-score of -0.8 SD so an intravenous perfusion with zolendronic acid 5 mg was administered plus vitamin D supplements. While she had no additional fracture and glycated haemoglobin A1c remained around 6.2-6.4%, one year later, the pandemic started, so only bone turnover markers (BTM) were assessed, not DXA: suppressed CrossLaps=0.22 ng/mL (normal: 0.33-0.782 ng/ mL), osteocalcin=11 ng/mL (normal: 15-46 ng/mL), P1NP=27 pg/mL (normal: 15-45 pg/mL). She continued with vitamin D, and 20 months after injection CrossLaps remained low (=22 ng/mL) with normal osteocalcin (=15 ng/mL), P1NP (=28 pg/mL) and stationary BMD. Conclusion: Zolendronic acid effect in osteoporotic patients is easy to access by blood assays if DXA is not available, while lack of BTM increase is suggestive for a good outcome.